Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify units and g-force for accelerometer #701

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rennis250
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ This file contains data recorded by the integrated [IMU](/data-collection/data-s
| **recording id** | Unique identifier of the recording this sample belongs to. |
| **timestamp [ns]** | UTC timestamp in nanoseconds of the sample. |
| **gyro x [deg/s]**<br />**gyro y [deg/s]**<br />**gyro z [deg/s]** | Rotation speed around x, y or z-axis respectively in degrees/s. |
| **acceleration&nbsp;x&nbsp;[G]**<br />**acceleration&nbsp;y&nbsp;[G]**<br />**acceleration z [G]** | Translational acceleration along the x, y or z-axis respectively in G. Note `1 G = 9.80665 m/s^2`.|
| **acceleration&nbsp;x&nbsp;[g]**<br />**acceleration&nbsp;y&nbsp;[g]**<br />**acceleration z [g]** | Translational acceleration along the x, y or z-axis respectively in units of [g-force](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-force). Note `1 g-force = 9.80665 m/s^2`.|
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically, g-force is the name of the force and g is the name of the unit, isn't it? Using g-force as the unit in the text seems inaccurate.

If we want to mention g-force explicitly we could maybe say "Translational acceleration/g-force along..."? Or we just keep the link as is but change g-force to g.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@rennis250 rennis250 Aug 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'g-force' is a confusing name, I find. It is force per unit mass, so it works out to a unit of acceleration. Some texts clarify that it should not be considered a force.

The unit of 'g-force' is written as 'g', but that is also easily confused with the 'g' of free-fall acceleration, which points downwards (provided you use a standard reference frame), whereas, when you stand on Earth, 'g-force' points upwards. 'G-force' is technically derived from 'g', so the absolute magnitude is the same, hence 'g' as the unit, but the direction is different.

True, you cannot really say "units of g-force", but rather, "total g-force that an object experiences". It is "the number of g units of acceleration," such as "that object experienced a g-force of 5.3g". I was trying to be compact and not add too much text. I will think of something better, as I feel it is useful for users that just read this part quickly and don't go through the link. For example, when you lay Neon down and upright on a table, you get +g for acceleration Z, and when turn Neon on its right side, you get -g for X acceleration. Both of which are confusing if you assume the 'g' of free-fall acceleration.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about:

Translational acceleration (in terms of g-force) along the x, y or z-axis respectively. Note 1 g = 9.80665 m/s^2.

Or maybe "acceleration (measured as g-force)"?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either version seems fine to me! 👍

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marc-tonsen Ok, done. Thanks for catching that!

@rennis250 rennis250 changed the title Clarify units of g-force for accelerometer Clarify units and g-force for accelerometer Aug 6, 2024
@marc-tonsen marc-tonsen merged commit ad07bfe into master Aug 6, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@marc-tonsen marc-tonsen deleted the imu_accel_units branch August 6, 2024 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants